+1
Reynold Xin 于2019年1月4日周五 上午9:28写道:
> Committers,
>
> When you merge tickets fixing correctness bugs, please make sure you tag
> the tickets with "correctness" label. I've found multiple tickets today that
> didn't do that.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Tom Graves
> wrote:
>
>> Since
Committers,
When you merge tickets fixing correctness bugs, please make sure you tag the
tickets with "correctness" label. I've found multiple tickets today that didn't
do that.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:11 AM, Tom Graves < tgraves...@yahoo.com.invalid >
wrote:
>
> Since we haven't heard any
Since we haven't heard any objections to this, the documentation has been
updated (Thanks to Sean).
All devs please make sure to re-read: http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
.
Note the set of labels used in Jira has been documented and correctness or data
loss issues should be marked as b
+1 on what we should do.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Tom Graves
wrote:
>
> > I mean, what are concrete steps beyond saying this is a problem? That's
> the important thing to discuss.
>
> Sorry I'm a bit confused by your statement but also think I agree. I
> started this thread for this rea
> I mean, what are concrete steps beyond saying this is a problem? That's the
>important thing to discuss.
Sorry I'm a bit confused by your statement but also think I agree. I started
this thread for this reason. I pointed out that I thought it was a problem and
also brought up things I thoug
Generally: if someone thinks correctness fix X should be backported
further, I'd say just do it, if it's to an active release branch (see
below). Anything that important has to outweigh most any other concern,
like behavior changes.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:08 AM Tom Graves wrote:
> I'm not r
I don't think we've been great about backporting correctness issues. This
is one example which comes to mind (not to point fingers, just the one I
know of immediately):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23207
we also let another related issue slide for quite a while:
https://issues.ap
Not a specific jira but was looking at all the recent jiras with the
"correctness" label and things are definitely being handled in consistently in
my opinion (https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels+%3D+correctness).
The inconsistencies are in the things I've mentioned above. Pr
I doubt the question is whether people want to take such issues seriously
-- all else equal, of course everyone does.
A JIRA label plus place in the release notes sounds like a good concrete
step that isn't happening consistently now. That's a clear flag that at
least one person believes issue X i
Hello all,
I've noticed some inconsistencies in the way we are handling data
loss/correctness issues. I think we need to take these very seriously as they
could be causing businesses real money and impacting real decisions and
business logic. I would like to discuss how we can make sure these
10 matches
Mail list logo