Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

Thanks Holden -- this is a good point. I will reach out to sparklyr developers and make sure they are subscribed to the dev mailing list. Thanks Shivaram On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 7:52 PM Holden Karau wrote: > +1 > > Are the sparklyr folks on this list? > > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkara

Re: [外部邮件] Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

ek Lim >> 时间：2024-08-16 09:06:52 >> 主题：[外部邮件] Re： [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR >> 收件人：Wenchen Fan; >> 抄送人：L. C. Hsieh;Dongjoon >> Hyun;Holden >> Karau;Xiao Li;Hyukjin Kwon< >> gurwls...@apache.org>;Nicholas Chammas;Shivaram >> Venkataraman;

Re: [外部邮件] Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 Let's start a vote? On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 2:05 AM yangjie01 wrote: > +1 > 原始邮件 > 发件人：Jungtaek Lim > 时间：2024-08-16 09:06:52 > 主题：[外部邮件] Re： [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR > 收件人：Wenchen Fan; > 抄送人：L. C. Hsieh;Dongjoon > Hyun;Holden > Kara

答复: [外部邮件] Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 原始邮件 发件人：Jungtaek Lim 时间：2024-08-16 09:06:52 主题：[外部邮件] Re： [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR 收件人：Wenchen Fan; 抄送人：L. C. Hsieh;Dongjoon Hyun;Holden Karau;Xiao Li;Hyukjin Kwon;Nicholas Chammas;Shivaram Venkataraman;dev; +1 Looks to be sufficient to VOTE? 2024년 8월 14일 (수) 오전 1

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 On 2024/08/13 23:45:11 Xiangrui Meng wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, 2:43 PM Jungtaek Lim > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Looks to be sufficient to VOTE? > > > > 2024년 8월 14일 (수) 오전 1:10, Wenchen Fan 님이 작성: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:50 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> > >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2024, 2:43 PM Jungtaek Lim wrote: > +1 > > Looks to be sufficient to VOTE? > > 2024년 8월 14일 (수) 오전 1:10, Wenchen Fan 님이 작성: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:50 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 2:54 AM Dongjoon Hyun >>> wrote: >>> > >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 Looks to be sufficient to VOTE? 2024년 8월 14일 (수) 오전 1:10, Wenchen Fan 님이 작성: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:50 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 2:54 AM Dongjoon Hyun >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Dongjoon >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 17:52 Holden Kara

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:50 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 2:54 AM Dongjoon Hyun > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Dongjoon > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 17:52 Holden Karau > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Are the sparklyr folks on this list? > >> > >> Twitter: https://

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 2:54 AM Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > +1 > > Dongjoon > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 17:52 Holden Karau wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> Are the sparklyr folks on this list? >> >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://am

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 It’s actually great that projects outside Spark’s repo can be more successful than the projects inside. A testament to both Spark itself and Spark Connect! On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:00 AM Martin Grund wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:26 AM Ruifeng Zheng wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:26 AM Ruifeng Zheng wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 1:08 PM Holden Karau > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Are the sparklyr folks on this list? >> >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >> https://amzn.to/2M

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 1:08 PM Holden Karau wrote: > +1 > > Are the sparklyr folks on this list? > > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau > Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): > https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 > YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtu

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 Dongjoon On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 17:52 Holden Karau wrote: > +1 > > Are the sparklyr folks on this list? > > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau > Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): > https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 > YouTube Live Streams: https://w

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Aug 12, 2024, 6:56 PM Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > > +1 > > Regards, > Mridul > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 6:18 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:04 AM Nicholas Chammas < >> nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> And just for the record, t

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 Regards, Mridul On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 6:18 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:04 AM Nicholas Chammas < > nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And just for the record, the stats that I screenshotted >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 Are the sparklyr folks on this list? Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau Pronouns: she/her On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 5:22

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 Hyukjin Kwon 于2024年8月12日周一 16:18写道： > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:04 AM Nicholas Chammas < > nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And just for the record, the stats that I screenshotted >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:04 AM Nicholas Chammas wrote: > And just for the record, the stats that I screenshotted > > in > that t

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

And just for the record, the stats that I screenshotted in that thread I linked to showed the following page views for each sub-secti

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

Not an R user myself, but +1. I first wondered about the future of SparkR after noticing how low the visit stats were for the R API docs as compared to Python and Scala. (I can’t seem to find those visit stats

[DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

Hi About ten years ago, I created the original SparkR package as part of my research at UC Berkeley [SPARK-5654 ]. After my PhD I started as a professor at UW-Madison and my contributions to SparkR have been in the background given my availability.