[GitHub] spark pull request: Update io.netty from 4.0.13 Final to 4.0.17.Fi...

2014-03-02 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41#issuecomment-36449390 Yep, found the problem now. Should be fixed! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark pull request: Update io.netty from 4.0.13 Final to 4.0.17.Fi...

2014-03-02 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41#issuecomment-36449199 just add Author to both PR and the commit. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] spark pull request: Update io.netty from 4.0.13 Final to 4.0.17.Fi...

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
GitHub user ngbinh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41 Update io.netty from 4.0.13 Final to 4.0.17.Final This update contains a lot of bug fixes and some new perf improvements. It is also binary compatible with the current 4.0.13.Final For

[GitHub] spark pull request: [WIP] [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26#issuecomment-36292181 @pwendell Yes! You can point to https://github.com/ngbinh/spark-vagrant --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] spark pull request: [WIP] [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] spark pull request: [WIP] [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26#issuecomment-36279863 @pwendell makes sense! I will maintain this on its own repo. Close for now! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
GitHub user ngbinh reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26 [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark This PR uses Vagrant to create a clusters of three VMs, one master and two workers. It allows running/testing Spark Cluster mode on one machine. My

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26#issuecomment-36275658 Thanks for reminding me. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26#issuecomment-36226895 One of the main reason I work on this PR is I found many times working on Spark local mode doesn't expose problems when deployed on a cluster. This PR should allow

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26#issuecomment-36226574 I can argue that having ec2, stand alone cluster scripts inside the core repo is important for Spark adoption. @markhamstra I agree. My feeling is the benefit is

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-1146] Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
Github user ngbinh commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26#issuecomment-36226015 I agree that while they are not necessary be a part of Spark core because there is usually no direct dependencies between them. But I feel like they make Spark more

[GitHub] spark pull request: Vagrant support for Spark

2014-02-27 Thread ngbinh
GitHub user ngbinh opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26 Vagrant support for Spark This PR uses Vagrant to create a clusters of three VMs, one master and two workers. It allows running/testing Spark Cluster mode on one machine. My initial goal is