Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecating SparkR

2024-08-12 Thread Sadha Chilukoori
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Aug 12, 2024, 6:56 PM Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > > +1 > > Regards, > Mridul > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 6:18 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 7:04 AM Nicholas Chammas < >> nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> And just for the record, t

Re: [VOTE] Differentiate Spark without Spark Connect from Spark Connect

2024-07-22 Thread Sadha Chilukoori
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:56 PM Wenchen Fan wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:40 AM Xinrong Meng wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon ! >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:20 PM Gengliang Wang wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:19 PM Hyukjin Kwon

Re: [DISCUSS] Differentiate Spark without Spark Connect from Spark Connect

2024-07-22 Thread Sadha Chilukoori
gt; in our documentation? > > A. Since `Spark Connect` mode has no RDD API, we need to use `Spark > Classic` mode instead. > B. Since `Spark Connect` mode has no RDD API, we need to use `Spark > without Spark Connect` mode instead. > > Dongjoon. > > > > On 2024/0

Re: [DISCUSS] Differentiate Spark without Spark Connect from Spark Connect

2024-07-22 Thread Sadha Chilukoori
+1 (non-binding) for classic. On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:59 AM Martin Grund wrote: > +1 for classic. It's simple, easy to understand and it doesn't have the > negative meanings like legacy for example. > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 23:48 Wenchen Fan wrote: > >> Classic SGTM. >> >> On Mon, Jul 22,