Re: Palantir replease under org.apache.spark?

2018-01-11 Thread Prajwal Tuladhar
If you check https://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.spark%22, it's only listing "official" ones. On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > > On 9 Jan 2018, at 18:10, Sean Owen wrote: > > Just to follow up -- those are actually in a Palantir repo, not Cent

Re: Anyone seeing a lot of Spark emails go to Gmail spam?

2016-11-02 Thread Prajwal Tuladhar
Some messages from Apache mailing lists (Spark and ZK) were being marked as spam by Gmail. After manually unmarking them as Spam few times, it seems to have worked for me. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Russell Spitzer wrote: > I had one bounce message last week, but haven't seen anything else,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announcing Spark 2.0.1

2016-10-04 Thread Prajwal Tuladhar
Hi, It seems like, 2.0.1 artifact hasn't been published to Maven Central. Can anyone confirm? On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: > We are happy to announce the availability of Spark 2.0.1! > > Apache Spark 2.0.1 is a maintenance release containing 300 stability and > bug fixes.

Re: Spark internal Logging trait potential thread unsafe

2016-06-22 Thread Prajwal Tuladhar
og_ the way it is now. initializeLogIfNecessary() has a purpose > though. > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Prajwal Tuladhar > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The way log instance inside Logger trait is current being initialized > > doesn't seem to be thread safe [1]. Current impl

Spark internal Logging trait potential thread unsafe

2016-06-16 Thread Prajwal Tuladhar
Hi, The way log instance inside Logger trait is current being initialized doesn't seem to be thread safe [1]. Current implementation only guarantees initializeLogIfNecessary() is initialized in lazy + thread safe way. Is there a reason why it can't be just: [2] @transient private lazy val log_ :