+1
Dr. Kushal Datta
Senior Research Scientist
Big Data Research & Pathfinding
Intel Corporation, USA.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1
>
> no problem for me to remove Python 2.6 in 2.0.
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> O
15-20mins.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Sree V
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> How long does it takes for a full build 'mvn clean package' on spark
> 1.2.2-rc1 ?
>
>
> Thanking you.
>
> With Regards
> Sree
Reynold, what's the idea behind using LLVM?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Akhil Das
wrote:
> Nice try :)
>
> Thanks
> Best Regards
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
>
> > Hi Spark devs,
> >
> > I've spent the last few months investigating the feasibility of
> > re-archi
Kudos to the whole team for such a significant achievement!
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Patrick Wendell
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm happy to announce the availability of Spark 1.3.0! Spark 1.3.0 is
> the fourth release on the API-compatible 1.X line. It is Spark's
> largest release ever, with
I want to address the issue that Matei raised about the heavy lifting
required for a full SQL support. It is amazing that even after 30 years of
research there is not a single good open source columnar database like
Vertica. There is a column store option in MySQL, but it is not nearly as
sophistic
code updated. sorry, wrong branch uploaded before.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Kushal Datta
wrote:
> The source code is under a new module named 'graphx'. let me double check.
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Kyle Ellrott
> wrote:
>
>> Looking at https
/com/tinkerpop/gremlin/hadoop/structure/HadoopGraph.java#L135
> ).
>
>
> Kyle
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Kushal Datta
> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>>
>> Yes, we are still headed in that direction.
>> Please take a loo
Hi David,
Yes, we are still headed in that direction.
Please take a look at the repo I sent earlier.
I think that's a good starting point.
Thanks,
-Kushal.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:31 AM, David Robinson
wrote:
> I am new to Spark and GraphX, however, I use Tinkerpop backed graphs and
> think
es are structured in the same way they are in the
> Gigraph implementation. There isn't much actual GraphX code in the project
> yet, just a framework to start working in.
> Hopefully this will keep the conversation going.
>
> Kyle
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Kushal Da
;>>> space sitting inline with other major distributions (Neo4j, Titan, etc.).
>>>> * Allows for the abstract graph traversal logic (query API) to be owned
>>>> and maintained by a group already proven on the topic.
>>>>
>>>> Drawbacks:
&g
Ellrott
> Date: Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 12:10 PM
> To: Kushal Datta
> Cc: Reynold Xin , "York, Brennon" <
> brennon.y...@capitalone.com>, "dev@spark.apache.org" ,
> Matthias Broecheler
> Subject: Re: Implementing TinkerPop on top of GraphX
>
&g
What do you guys think about the Tinkerpop3 Gremlin interface?
It has MapReduce to run Gremlin operators in a distributed manner and
Giraph to execute vertex programs.
The Tinkpop3 is better suited for GraphX.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Kyle Ellrott wrote:
> I've taken a crack at implemen
+1 (binding)
For tickets which span across multiple components, will it need to be
approved by all maintainers? For example, I'm working on the Python
bindings of GraphX where code is added to both Python and GraphX modules.
Thanks,
-Kushal.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Ankur Dave wrote:
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
