Hello,
Any more thoughts on this one?
Will that be let in 2.4.1 or rather not?
Thanks in advance,
Jakub
On 8 Mar 2019, at 11:26, Jakub Wozniak
mailto:jakub.wozn...@cern.ch>> wrote:
Hi,
To me it is backwards compatible with older Hbase versions.
The code actually only falls back to the
akub
On 8 Mar 2019, at 11:15, Jakub Wozniak
mailto:jakub.wozn...@cern.ch>> wrote:
I guess it is that one:
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/dfed439e33b7bf224dd412b0960402068d961c7b#diff-9ebb59b7b008c694a8f583b94bd24e1d
Cheers,
Jakub
On 7 Mar 2019, at 17:25, Sean Owen mailto:sro...
2019 at 8:57 AM Jakub Wozniak
mailto:jakub.wozn...@cern.ch>> wrote:
Hello,
I have a question regarding the 2.4.1 release.
It looks like Spark 2.4 (and 2.4.1-rc) is not exactly compatible with Hbase
2.x+ for the Yarn mode.
The problem is in the
org.apache.spark.deploy.security.HbaseDelegat
Hello,
I have a question regarding the 2.4.1 release.
It looks like Spark 2.4 (and 2.4.1-rc) is not exactly compatible with Hbase
2.x+ for the Yarn mode.
The problem is in the
org.apache.spark.deploy.security.HbaseDelegationTokenProvider class that
expects a specific version of TokenUtil class
you have any recommendation / experience with that?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Jakub
On 14 Jun 2018, at 12:07, Jakub Wozniak
mailto:jakub.wozn...@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear Ryan,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
After having sent the e-mail we have investigated a bit more the data itse
if it is that much slower.
I'd be happy to see vectorization for nested Parquet data move forward, but I
think you might want to get an idea of how much it will help before you move
forward with it. Can you use Impala to test whether vectorization would help
here?
rb
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at
.2.1.
Best regards,
Jakub Wozniak
-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
ormat`, which is the API for the
Spark builtin file-based data source like parquet. It's an internal API but has
not been changed for a long time. In the future, data source v2 would be the
best solution.
Thanks,
Wenchen
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:17 AM, Jakub Wozniak
mailto:jakub.wozn...@c
oach looked like a more elegant solution. Only
>> the performance is still far from the desired one.
>>
>> Any help or direction in that matter would be greatly appreciated as we have
>> only started to build our Spark expertise yet.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jakub Wozniak
>> Software Engineer
>> CERN
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>