I was one that argued for fine-grain mode, and there is something I still
appreciate about how fine-grain mode operates in terms of the way one would
define a Mesos framework. That said, with dyn-allocation and Mesos support for
both resource reservation, oversubscription and revocation, I think
something like
Tachyon to achieve in fine grain mode.
From: Timothy Chen mailto:tnac...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 11:05 AM
To: "Heller, Chris" mailto:chel...@akamai.com>>
Cc: Reynold Xin mailto:r...@databricks.com>>,
"dev@spark.apach
We’ve been making use of both. Fine-grain mode makes sense for more ad-hoc work
loads, and coarse-grained for more job like loads on a common data set. My
preference is the fine-grain mode in all cases, but the overhead associated
with its startup and the possibility that an overloaded cluster w
I appreciate targets having the strong meaning you suggest, as its useful
to get a sense of what will realistically be included in a release.
Would it make sense (speaking as a relative outsider here) that we would
not enter into the RC phase of a release until all JIRA targeting that
release wer
