A quick message from the ASF Infra team here regarding this thread.
As of a couple of minutes ago, attached images are no longer supported on this
mailing list in the foreseeable future. The TL;DR of that is that these 20
megabyte emails are sent out to several thousands of people, which in turn
[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE
DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS]
Hello Apache projects,
I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the
git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming
mon
re just local copies of
> third party tools though, and don't really matter. As it happens, the
> licenses that get distributed with the source distro even cover all of
> this stuff. I think that's not supposed to be there, but, also don't
> see it's 'invalid' as a
none
> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-1.5.1-rc1-bin/
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 10/11/2015 05:12 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>>> The Spark releases include a source distribution and several binary
>>> distributions
niel.
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> Out of curiosity: How can you vote on a release that contains 34 binary
>> files? Surely a source code release should only contain source code and not
>> binaries, as you cannot verify the content of thes
Out of curiosity: How can you vote on a release that contains 34 binary files?
Surely a source code release should only contain source code and not binaries,
as you cannot verify the content of these.
Looking forward to a response.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 10/2/2015, 4:42:31 AM, Reynold Xin w
re’s nothing we can do to change it on our end, but this was originally
> set up by Daniel Gruno and Jake Farrel:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7276.
>
> Matei
>
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 10:46 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2014
