Congrats guys!
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Congratulations, Herman and Wenchen.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Matei Zaharia
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The PMC has recently added two new Spark committers -- Herman van Hovell
>> and Wenchen Fan. Both have been heavily
David,
Thank you very much for announcing this! It looks like it could be very
useful. Would you mind providing a link to the github?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:03 AM, David
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to share news of the recent release of a new Spark package, ROSE.
>
>
> ROSE is a Scala lib
Mohamed,
Have you checked out the Spark Timeseries [1] project? Non-seasonal ARIMA
was added to this recently and seasonal ARIMA should be following shortly.
[1] https://github.com/cloudera/spark-timeseries
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Mohamed Baddar
wrote:
> Hello everybody , this my firs
Unfortunately, MongoDB does not directly expose its locality via its client
API so the problem with trying to schedule Spark tasks against it is that
the tasks themselves cannot be scheduled locally on nodes containing query
results- which means you can only assume most results will be sent over th
Congrats guys! Keep up the awesome work!
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Guru Medasani wrote:
> Congratulations to all the new committers!
>
> Guru Medasani
> gdm...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Jun 17, 2015, at 5:12 PM, Matei Zaharia
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Over the past 1.5 months we add
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified signatures
- Built on Mac OS X and Fedora 21.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Krishna Sankar wrote:
> Excellent, Thanks Xiangrui. The mystery is solved.
> Cheers
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Xiangrui Meng wrote:
>
> > Krishna, I tested your linear regre
x Parquet filter push-down
> SPARK-5310 SPARK-5166 Update SQL programming guide for 1.3
> SPARK-5183 SPARK-5180 Document data source API
> SPARK-3650 Triangle Count handles reverse edges incorrectly
> SPARK-3511 Create a RELEASE-NOTES.txt file in the repo
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 20
This vote was supposed to close on Saturday but it looks like no PMCs voted
(other than the implicit vote from Patrick). Was there a discussion offline
to cut an RC2? Was the vote extended?
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Robin East wrote:
> Running ec2 launch scripts gives me the following err
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified signatures using [1]
- Built on MacOSX Yosemite
- Built on Fedora 21
Each build was run with and Hadoop-2.4 version with yarn, hive, and
hive-thriftserver profiles
I am having trouble getting all the tests passing on a single run on both
machines but we have this same
Niranda,
I'm not sure if I'd say Spark's use of Jetty to expose its UI monitoring
layer constitutes a use of "two web servers in a single product". Hadoop
uses Jetty as well as do many other applications today that need embedded
http layers for serving up their monitoring UI to users. This is comp
Congrats guys!
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Evan Chan wrote:
> Congrats everyone!!!
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Timothy Chen wrote:
> > Congrats all!
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >> On Feb 4, 2015, at 7:10 AM, Pritish Nawlakhe <
> prit...@nirvana-international.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Congrats
Reynold,
One thing I'd like worked into the public portion of the API is the json
inferencing logic that creates a Set[(String, StructType)] out of
Map[String,Any]. SPARK-5260 addresses this so that I can use Accumulators
to infer my schema instead of forcing a map/reduce phase to occur on an RDD
I was actually about to post this myself- I have a complex join that could
benefit from something like a GroupComparator vs having to do multiple
grouyBy operations. This is probably the wrong thread for a full discussion
on this but I didn't see a JIRA ticket for this or anything similar- any
reas
ere is no further
> specialization needed beyond that. The profile sets hadoop.version to
> 2.4.0 by default, but this can be overridden.
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Corey Nolet wrote:
> > I noticed Spark 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still has 2.4.x in the pom. Since 2.5.x is
> >
I noticed Spark 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT still has 2.4.x in the pom. Since 2.5.x is
the current stable Hadoop 2.x, would it make sense for us to update the
poms?
I'm actually going to change my non-binding to +0 for the proposal as-is.
I overlooked some parts of the original proposal that, when reading over
them again, do not sit well with me. "one of the maintainers needs to sign
off on each patch to the component", as Greg has pointed out, does seem to
i
PMC [1] is responsible for oversight and does not designate partial or full
committer. There are projects where all committers become PMC and others
where PMC is reserved for committers with the most merit (and willingness
to take on the responsibility of project oversight, releases, etc...).
Commu
+1 (non-binding) [for original process proposal]
Greg, the first time I've seen the word "ownership" on this thread is in
your message. The first time the word "lead" has appeared in this thread is
in your message as well. I don't think that was the intent. The PMC and
Committers have a responsibi
A concrete plan and a definite version upon which the upgrade would be
applied sounds like it would benefit the community. If you plan far enough
out (as Hadoop has done) and give the community enough of a notice, I can't
see it being a problem as they would have ample time upgrade.
On Sat, Oct
19 matches
Mail list logo
