RE: Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps

Thank you all for your comments and suggestions! Let me rewrite the document. On 2025/03/17 22:28:35 Gengliang Wang wrote: > Hi Qi, > > Thanks for the proposal. I am generally +1 with the idea. Could you clarify > which option is preferred in “Q1. What are you trying to do?”? > Understanding this

RE: Re: [Discuss] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps

Updated. Thanks. On 2025/03/13 23:56:20 Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Hi, would you mind allowing comments on the doc? Thanks! > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 8:50 AM Qi Tan wrote: > > > Hello everybody, > > > > I would like to start a discussion on SPARK-50532 > >