Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Go Client 0.1.0

2025-06-09 Thread bo yang
+1 (non-binding), thanks Martin! On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 7:47 PM Cheng Pan wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I verified: > > 1. LICENSE/NOTICE are present > 2. Signatures is correct > 3. Build source code and run UT (I have to replace sparksrc folder with > the content of spark-4.0.0.tgz to make the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Go Client 0.1.0

2025-06-09 Thread Cheng Pan
+1 (non-binding) I verified: 1. LICENSE/NOTICE are present 2. Signatures is correct 3. Build source code and run UT (I have to replace sparksrc folder with the content of spark-4.0.0.tgz to make the source happen) Thanks, Cheng Pan > On Jun 10, 2025, at 00:59, Martin Grund wrote: > > Hi fo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Go Client 0.1.0

2025-06-09 Thread Martin Grund
Hi folks, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark Connect Go Client 0.1.0. The release candidate was tested and built against Spark 4.0.0. The repository contains a sample application for submitting jobs written in Go using a small JVM wrapper

Re: [DISCUSS] Automation of RC email

2025-06-09 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
The PR is ready for a look 👍 On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 at 17:41, Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > I am working on it at https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/51122. > Some emails might be sent for RC 3.5.7 for testing purposes. Please ignore > them :-). I will reply to individual email as well to avoid confusion.

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.5.7 (RC1)

2025-06-09 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
These RC artifacts were dropped properly. On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 07:09, Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > This is an automated vote. Please ignore it. > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 6:46 AM wrote: > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version >> 3.5.7. >> >> The vote is open unti

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Go Client 0.1.0

2025-06-09 Thread Martin Grund
Thanks for the feedback, I'll address it shortly. On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 08:31 Cheng Pan wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for addressing it, a few questions/issues I found: > > 1. The "fun Version"[1] returns "3.5.x”, this does not look like a correct > version as you claim this release candidates

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Go Client 0.1.0

2025-06-09 Thread Cheng Pan
Hi Martin, Thanks for addressing it, a few questions/issues I found: 1. The "fun Version"[1] returns "3.5.x”, this does not look like a correct version as you claim this release candidates was built and tested against Spark 4.0.0. 2. Seems your public key was not added to KEYS, so I can not ve

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 3.5.7 (RC1)

2025-06-09 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
This is an automated vote. Please ignore it. On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 6:46 AM wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 3.5.7. > > The vote is open until Fri, 13 Jun 2025 06:32:20 PDT and passes if a > majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with > a minimum of 3

[VOTE] Release Spark 3.5.7 (RC1)

2025-06-09 Thread gurwls223
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 3.5.7. The vote is open until Fri, 13 Jun 2025 06:32:20 PDT and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.5.7 [ ] -1 Do not release this package

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark Connect Go Client 0.1.0

2025-06-09 Thread Martin Grund
I updated the release based on the tag with the source releases and the proper signature. https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-go/releases/tag/v0.1.0-rc1 On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 10:44 PM Cheng Pan wrote: > The release artifacts don’t satisfy the ASF release policy[1]. > > > Projects MUST dire

Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping LevelDB support in Spark

2025-06-09 Thread Jungtaek Lim
It's a bit different for users leveraging LevelDB - since it requires opt-in, they are willing to use it if they still use it, hence they are likely to retain the config during the upgrade. >From the initial post, there is a claim that we deprecated LevelDB in Apache Spark 4.0.0. Shall I ask what

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Upgrade Apache Hive to 4.x

2025-06-09 Thread Mich Talebzadeh
Thanks Angel for offer of your help I added some comments to this thread https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2387 The problem was observed with postgres DB issue. So I am not sure the cause is metastore on transactional DB or not. This error may not be relevant to other metastore for Hive b