Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Support NanoSecond Timestamps

2025-03-30 Thread huaxin gao
Thanks all for the discussion! I agree that we first need to reach a consensus on adding the TIMESTAMP(nanosecond) data type to Apache Spark. It's a standard data type supported by major databases like Oracle and IBM DB2, making it a necessary inclusion in Spark to align with industry practices.

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Add geospatial types to Spark

2025-03-30 Thread Szehon Ho
Hi Jia Yea I think the SPIP was trying to be concise and focused, but definitely was chatting yesterday with Menelaus on how to mention Sedona here but still keep it concise and focused :) It makes sense to collect feedbacks before the vote, thanks for the comments and collaboration here, and

Re: [DISCUSS] SPIP: Add geospatial types to Spark

2025-03-30 Thread Jia Yu
Hey Angel, I am glad that you asked these questions. Please see my answers below. *1. Domain types evolve quickly. - It has taken years for Parquet to include these new types in its format... We could evolve alongside Parquet. Unfortunately, Spark is not known for upgrading its dependencies quic