Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0-preview2 (RC1)

2024-09-19 Thread Yang Jie
+1 On 2024/09/19 23:33:39 Shubham Patel wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, 19 Sept 2024, 01:05 Gengliang Wang, wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:47 PM Xiao Li wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 18:22 Yuming Wang wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 4.0.0-preview2 (RC1)

2024-09-19 Thread Shubham Patel
+1 On Thu, 19 Sept 2024, 01:05 Gengliang Wang, wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:47 PM Xiao Li wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 18:22 Yuming Wang wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 6:07 PM Cheng Pan wrote: >>> +1 (non-binding) I checked -

Re: Variant spec and its security implications

2024-09-19 Thread Gang Wu
+ dev@spark because authors of variant may not subscribe to dev@parquet On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 7:33 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > I've been reading the spec in more detail here: > > https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/d84f1a3575c4125009374521d2f179089ebd71ad/common/variant/README.md#

Re: [DISCUSS] [Spark SQL] Single-pass Analyzer SPIP

2024-09-19 Thread Reynold Xin
Great document! Thanks for writing it up. On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:00 AM Vladimir Golubev wrote: > Hey folks, following up on the recent single-pass Analyzer discussion. I > made a high-level proposal document for this idea: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dWxvrJV-0joGdLtWbvJ0uNyTocDMJ90