答复: [外部邮件] Re: [VOTE] Deprecate SparkR

+1 原始邮件 发件人：Jungtaek Lim 时间：2024-08-26 16:01:14 主题：[外部邮件] Re： [VOTE] Deprecate SparkR 收件人：Dongjoon Hyun; 抄送人：dev@spark.apache.org; +1 (non-binding) Thanks for initiating the discussion and vote. On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 5:36 AM Dongjoon Hyun mailto:dongj...@apache.org>> wrote: +1

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Variant to Parquet?

Thanks Gang for initiating the discussion in the parquet community. Thanks Gene for bringing it up here. We're more than happy to assist with anything needed for the migration. Please let us know how we can help! Yufei On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 2:35 AM Gang Wu wrote: > Hi, > > There is a releva

Re: [DISCUSS] [Spark SQL] A single-pass resolution approach for the Catalyst Analyzer

+1. The analyzer rule order issue has bitten me multiple times and it's very hard to make your analyzer rule bug-free if it interacts with other rules. On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 2:49 AM Reynold Xin wrote: > +1 on this too > > When I implemented "group by all", I introduced at least two subtle bugs