Absolutely we should do that. I thought that the default rule was inclusive
already so that once folks have their first contribution it would
automatically allow kicking of the workflows.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 04:20 Matthew Powers
wrote:
> Yea, this would be great.
>
> spark-connect-go is still
+1
John Zhuge
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 7:41 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:48 PM Reynold Xin
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:45 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:54 PM Dongjoon Hyun
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>>
+1
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 6:24 PM Jungtaek Lim
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 8:48 AM Reynold Xin
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:45 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:54 PM Dongjoon Hyun
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
+1
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 10:41 AM Gengliang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:48 PM Reynold Xin
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:45 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:54 PM Dongjoon Hyun
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > Dongjoon
>
Yea, this would be great.
spark-connect-go is still experimental and anything we can do to get it
production grade would be a great step IMO. The Go community is excited to
write Spark... with Go!
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:49 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Spark Connect Go client repo
Hi all,
The Spark Connect Go client repository (
https://github.com/apache/spark-connect-go) requires GitHub Actions runs
for individual commits within contributors' PRs.
This policy was intentionally applied (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24387), but we can change this
default onc
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 8:48 AM Reynold Xin
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:45 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:54 PM Dongjoon Hyun
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Dongjoon
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 10:58 Xinrong Meng wrote
+1
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:48 PM Reynold Xin
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:45 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:54 PM Dongjoon Hyun
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Dongjoon
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 10:58 Xinrong Meng wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
+1
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:45 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:54 PM Dongjoon Hyun
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Dongjoon
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 10:58 Xinrong Meng wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon !
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:55 AM bo
+1
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 3:54 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Dongjoon
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 10:58 Xinrong Meng wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon !
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:55 AM bo yang wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:22 PM Cheng
+1
Dongjoon
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 10:58 Xinrong Meng wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon !
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:55 AM bo yang wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:22 PM Cheng Pan wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cheng Pan
>>>
>>>
>>> O
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:58 PM Xinrong Meng wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon !
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:55 AM bo yang wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:22 PM Cheng Pan wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cheng Pan
+1
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 10:58 AM Xinrong Meng wrote:
> +1
>
> Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon !
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:55 AM bo yang wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:22 PM Cheng Pan wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cheng Pan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 3,
+1
Thank you @Hyukjin Kwon !
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 8:55 AM bo yang wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:22 PM Cheng Pan wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cheng Pan
>>
>>
>> On Jul 3, 2024, at 08:59, Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’d like to start a v
Thanks for being interested in the Spark Kubernetes Operator.
Because the initial PR is large so it is split into several PRs which
are good to review and merge.
And seems the initial series of PRs to merge the codes into the repo
is not done yet. For example, you can see there is PR to add the
op
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:22 PM Cheng Pan wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Cheng Pan
>
>
> On Jul 3, 2024, at 08:59, Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’d like to start a vote for moving Spark Connect server to builtin
> package (Client API layer stays external).
>
> P
16 matches
Mail list logo
