+1
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:19 PM, Dongjoon Hyun < dongjoon.h...@gmail.com >
wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> Thanks,
> Dongjoon.
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 7:14 PM Ye Zhou < zhouyejoe@ gmail. com (
> zhouye...@gmail.com ) > wrote:
>
>
>> +1(non-binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:16 Mridul M
+1
Thanks,
Dongjoon.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 7:14 PM Ye Zhou wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:16 Mridul Muralidharan
> wrote:
>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mridul
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:21 AM Kent Yao wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Spark Dev,
>>>
>>> Following the discussion
+1(non-binding)
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:16 Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:21 AM Kent Yao wrote:
>
>> Hi Spark Dev,
>>
>> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2].
>>
>> The SPIP aims to improve the test c
+1
Regards,
Mridul
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:21 AM Kent Yao wrote:
> Hi Spark Dev,
>
> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2].
>
> The SPIP aims to improve the test coverage and develop experience for
> Spark UI-related javascript codes.
>
> This thread will b
Hi Spark Dev,
Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2].
The SPIP aims to improve the test coverage and develop experience for
Spark UI-related javascript codes.
This thread will be open for at least the next 72 hours. Please vote
accordingly,
[ ] +1: Accept the
Thank you all. I will start an official vote for this SPIP.
Kent
On 2023/11/22 03:05:42 Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
> This should be a very good addition !
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 7:46 PM Dongjoon Hyun
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for proposing a new UI test framework for