Also, I want to replicate the comment Liang-Chi put into SPIP doc, as it is
a rather general and usual question for every new addition of data source.
Hence I want to sort it out for everyone.
As I know, the author implemented a third-party tool for query state store
> as a data source long time a
Thanks Raghu for your support!
Btw, I'd like to replicate the support from JIRA ticket itself, I see
support from Chaoqin and Praveen. Thanks both!
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 5:56 AM Raghu Angadi
wrote:
> +1 overall and a big +1 to keeping offline state-rebalancing as a primary
> use case.
>
> R
+1 overall and a big +1 to keeping offline state-rebalancing as a primary
use case.
Raghu.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:25 AM Bartosz Konieczny
wrote:
> Thank you, Jungtaek, for your answers! It's clear now.
>
> +1 for me. It seems like a prerequisite for further ops-related
> improvements for th
unsubscribe
Thanks Yuanjian for your support!
I've left a comment but to replicate here - I agree with your point. It's
really uneasy for a new feature to be stable from the initial version and
we might want to decide on breaking backward compatibility for
(semantic) bug fixes/improvements. Maybe we could mar
+1, I have no issues with the practicality and value of this feature itself.
I've left some comments concerning ongoing maintenance and
compatibility-related matters, which we can continue to discuss.
Jungtaek Lim 于2023年10月17日周二 05:23写道：
> Thanks Bartosz and Anish for your support!
>
> I'll wait
