With the spirit of open source, -1. At least there have been other cases
mentioned in the discussion thread, and solely doing it for one specific
vendor would not solve the problem, and I wouldn't also expect to cast a
vote for each case publicly.
I would prefer to start this in the narrower scope,
The major concerns raised in the thread were that we should initiate the
discussion for the below first:
- Apache Spark 4.0.0 Preview (and Dates)
- Apache Spark 4.0.0 Items
- Apache Spark 4.0.0 Plan Adjustment
before setting the timeline for Spark 4.0.0 because we're unclear on the
picture of Spar
