May I ask why do you thinkn in that way? Could you elaborate a little more
about your concerns if you mean it from a legal perspective?
> The ASF header states "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
under one or more contributor license agreements.”
> I ‘m not sure this is true with thi
Hi,
The issue is not the original header it is the addition of the ASF header. The
ASF header states "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
or more contributor license agreements.” I ‘m not sure this is true with this
file even though both Spark and this file are under the
+CC @Justin Mclean, and @Willem Jiang since you left the concerns
It looks like Spark may have incorrectly added that header. You could ask
> them why it was added perhaps or just leave it as is.
>
Kind Regards,
>
Justin
>
I have the same question as Justin asked, do we need to add the ASF Licen
Since both license headers are Apache License 2.0, we don't see any issue
there. They are compatible.
The first line of the second license header means the file was copied from
Google Guava project originally.
Apache Spark community keeps the original header because it has
`Authorship` part, `Cop
unsubscribe
Hi developers,
I have been running a release in project celeborn(incubating)
recently and the incubator PPMCs have arguments[2] about the headers
in source file[1] that we copied from the Spark source.
We don't understand why the source file[1] has two headers with
different copyright discl
unsubscribe
unsubscribe
