+1
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:39 PM Jungtaek Lim
wrote:
>
> Yes, exactly. I'm sorry to bring confusion - should have clarified action
> items on the proposal.
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 3:31 PM Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
>>
>> Then, could you elaborate `the proposed code change` specifically?
>> May
Yes, exactly. I'm sorry to bring confusion - should have clarified action
items on the proposal.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 3:31 PM Dongjoon Hyun
wrote:
> Then, could you elaborate `the proposed code change` specifically?
> Maybe, usual deprecation warning logs and annotation on the API?
>
>
> On T
Then, could you elaborate `the proposed code change` specifically?
Maybe, usual deprecation warning logs and annotation on the API?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:05 PM Jungtaek Lim
wrote:
> Maybe I need to clarify - my proposal is "explicitly" deprecating it,
> which incurs code change for sure. G
There might be possible terminology differences, so let me elaborate the
action item from the proposal explicitly:
- Add "deprecation" annotation to the user-facing public API in streaming
directory (DStream)
- Write a release note to explicitly mention the deprecation. (Maybe
promote again that t
Maybe I need to clarify - my proposal is "explicitly" deprecating it, which
incurs code change for sure. Guidance on the Spark website is done already
as I mentioned - we updated the DStream doc page to mention that DStream is
a "legacy" project and users should move to SS. I don't feel this is
suf
+1
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 9:46 PM, Dongjoon Hyun < dongjoon.h...@gmail.com >
wrote:
>
> +1 for the proposal (guiding only without any code change).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Dongjoon.
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 9:33 PM Shixiong Zhu < zsxwing@ gmail. com (
> zsxw...@gmail.com ) > wrote:
>
>
>> +1
>
+1 for the proposal (guiding only without any code change).
Thanks,
Dongjoon.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 9:33 PM Shixiong Zhu wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 5:08 PM Tathagata Das
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:46 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, 13 Ja
+1
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 5:08 PM Tathagata Das
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:46 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 08:51, Jungtaek Lim
>> wrote:
>>
>>> bump for more visibility.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:20 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>>> kabhwan.opensou.
+1
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:46 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 08:51, Jungtaek Lim
> wrote:
>
>> bump for more visibility.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:20 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi dev,
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose the depreca
+1
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 08:51, Jungtaek Lim
wrote:
> bump for more visibility.
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:20 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi dev,
>>
>> I'd like to propose the deprecation of DStream in Spark 3.4, in favor of
>> promoting Structured Streamin
bump for more visibility.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:20 PM Jungtaek Lim
wrote:
> Hi dev,
>
> I'd like to propose the deprecation of DStream in Spark 3.4, in favor of
> promoting Structured Streaming.
> (Sorry for the late proposal, if we don't make the change in 3.4, we will
> have to wait for a
11 matches
Mail list logo