I have mixed feelings about this proposal. Merging or diffing schemas is
a common operation, but specific requirements differ from case to case,
especially when complex nested data is used.
Even if we put ordering of the fields aside, data types equality
semantics (StructField in particular) i
Hello Rui and Tim,
Indeed this sound a good idea and quite useful. To make it more formal the
list of a StructType could be treated as a Scala/Python set by
providing(inheriting?) the common sets' functionality i.e add, remove,
concat, intersect, diff etc. The set like functionality could be part
