+1 (non-binding)
+1 (non-binding)
郑瑞峰 于2021年4月29日周四 上午10:50写道:
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
ruifengz
-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: "Hyukjin Kwon" ;
发送时间: 2021年4月29日(星期四) 上午8:14
收件人: "Sean Owen";
抄送: "Liang-Chi Hsieh";"dev";
主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 2.4.8 (RC3)
+1
On Thu
+1 (non-binding)
郑瑞峰 于2021年4月29日周四 上午10:50写道:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> ruifengz
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发件人: "Hyukjin Kwon" ;
> 发送时间: 2021年4月29日(星期四) 上午8:14
> 收件人: "Sean Owen";
> 抄送: "Liang-Chi Hsieh";"dev";
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release Spark 2.4.8 (RC3)
>
> +1
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
ruifengz
-- 原始邮件 --
发件人:
"Hyukjin Kwon"
+1
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021, 07:08 Sean Owen, wrote:
> +1 from me too, same result as last time.
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:33 AM Liang-Chi Hsieh wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>> 2.4.8.
>>
>> The vote is open until May 4th at 9AM PST and pas
I am fine with RocksDB state store as built-in state store. Actually the
proposal to have it as external module is to avoid the raised concern in the
previous effort.
The need to have it as experimental doesn't necessarily mean to have it as
external module, I think. They are two things. So I don'
+1 from me too, same result as last time.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:33 AM Liang-Chi Hsieh wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.4.8.
>
> The vote is open until May 4th at 9AM PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC
> votes are cast, with a minimum of
I verified the virtualenv & pyspark installation on OSX & linux works
as expected with the minimum version of Python.
I double checked the Python tagged versions (mostly checking Python
3.8 wasn't listed since Spark 2.x only does up to 3.7). It might be
good to include that as a reminder in the re
+1
Thank you!
Bests,
Dongjoon.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:32 AM Maxim Gekk
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 8:12 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:05 AM DB Tsai wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> > On Apr 28, 2021, at 9:26 AM, Liang-
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 8:12 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:05 AM DB Tsai wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> > On Apr 28, 2021, at 9:26 AM, Liang-Chi Hsieh wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark ve
Shall we make new releases for 3.0 and 3.1? So that people don't need to
change the sbt resolver/pom files to work around Bintray sunset. It's also
been a while since the last 3.0 and 3.1 releases.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 9:02 AM Matthew Powers
wrote:
> Great job fixing this!! I just checked an
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:05 AM DB Tsai wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> > On Apr 28, 2021, at 9:26 AM, Liang-Chi Hsieh wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> > 2.4.8.
> >
> > The vote is open until May 4th at 9AM PST and passes if a
+1 (binding)
> On Apr 28, 2021, at 9:26 AM, Liang-Chi Hsieh wrote:
>
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.4.8.
>
> The vote is open until May 4th at 9AM PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC
> votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Relea
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
2.4.8.
The vote is open until May 4th at 9AM PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC
votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.4.8
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
Hi,
Looks like both this PR and another PR have been merged into 2.4 branch.
Wondering if we will be seeing an RC3 soon?
Regards,
14 matches
Mail list logo