Hi,
Please check if the following regression should be included:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31352
Thanks,
Terry
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:54 AM Holden Karau wrote:
> If were ok waiting for it, I’d like to get
> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31298 in as well (it’s not a
> regre
If were ok waiting for it, I’d like to get
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31298 in as well (it’s not a
regression but it is a bug fix).
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:38 AM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
> It looks like a cool one but it's a pretty big one and affects the plans
> considerably ... maybe it
It looks like a cool one but it's a pretty big one and affects the plans
considerably ... maybe it's best to avoid adding it into 3.1.1 in
particular during the RC period if this isn't a clear regression that
affects many users.
2021년 1월 26일 (화) 오후 11:23, Peter Toth 님이 작성:
> Hey,
>
> Sorry for ch
Hey,
Sorry for chiming in a bit late, but I would like to suggest my PR (
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28885) for review and inclusion into
3.1.1.
Currently, invalid reuse reference nodes appear in many queries, causing
performance issues and incorrect explain plans. Now that
https://gith
