How about letting Xingbo make a major revision to the SPIP doc to make it
clear what proposed are? I like Felix's suggestion to switch to the new
Heilmeier template, which helps clarify what are proposed and what are not.
Then let's review the new SPIP and resume the vote.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7
Thanks Ryan!
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:19 PM Ryan Blue wrote:
> Everyone is welcome to join this discussion. Just send me an e-mail to get
> added to the invite.
>
> Stavros, I'll add you.
>
> rb
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:43 AM Stavros Kontopoulos <
> stavros.kontopou...@lightbend.com> wrote:
Everyone is welcome to join this discussion. Just send me an e-mail to get
added to the invite.
Stavros, I'll add you.
rb
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:43 AM Stavros Kontopoulos <
stavros.kontopou...@lightbend.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the update, is this meeting open for other people to join?
>
> St
OK, I suppose then we are getting bogged down into what a vote on an SPIP
means then anyway, which I guess we can set aside for now. With the level
of detail in this proposal, I feel like there is a reasonable chance I'd
still -1 the design or implementation.
And the other thing you're implicitly
So to me most of the questions here are implementation/design questions, I've
had this issue in the past with SPIP's where I expected to have more high level
design details but was basically told that belongs in the design jira follow
on. This makes me think we need to revisit what a SPIP reall
Thanks for the update, is this meeting open for other people to join?
Stavros
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:56 PM Ryan Blue
wrote:
> Here are my notes from the DSv2 sync last night. As always, if you have
> corrections, please reply with them. And if you’d like to be included on
> the invite to pa
Hi DB,
I saw that we already have 6 RCs, but the vote I can search by now was RC2,
were they all canceled?
Thanks
Saisai
DB Tsai 于2019年2月22日周五 上午4:51写道：
> I am cutting a new rc4 with fix from Felix. Thanks.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> DB Tsai
> --
