I’m very hesitant with this.
I don’t want to vote -1, because I personally think it’s important to do, but
I’d like to see more discussion points addressed and not voting completely on
the spirit of it.
First, SPIP doesn’t match the format of SPIP proposed and agreed on. (Maybe
this is a minor
Thank you, Shane!
Xiao
shane knapp 于2019年3月2日周六 下午4:28写道：
> adding new k8s functionality?
>
> something need upgrading in jenkins?
>
> are logs not being archived?
>
> odd build failure (and i mean *odd*)?
>
> PLEASE FILE A JIRA! :)
>
> adding a @shaneknapp to a PR github is no longer working
adding new k8s functionality?
something need upgrading in jenkins?
are logs not being archived?
odd build failure (and i mean *odd*)?
PLEASE FILE A JIRA! :)
adding a @shaneknapp to a PR github is no longer working for me as the
volume and complexity of requests has been increasing. i will no
+1 on mesos - what Sean says
From: Andrew Melo
Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 9:19 AM
To: Xingbo Jiang
Cc: Sean Owen; Xiangrui Meng; dev
Subject: Re: SPIP: Accelerator-aware Scheduling
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:48 AM Xingbo Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> To supp
+1, a critical feature for AI/DL!
Il giorno sab 2 mar 2019 alle ore 05:14 Weichen Xu <
weichen...@databricks.com> ha scritto:
> +1, nice feature!
>
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 6:11 AM Yinan Li wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:37 PM Tom Graves
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for the SPIP.
>>>
>>>
