Re: Welcoming Tejas Patil as a Spark committer

Congratulations Tejas. Cheers!! Shreelola On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Yanbo Liang wrote: > Congratulations Tejas. > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:31 PM, DB Tsai wrote: > >> Congratulations! >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Liwei Lin wrote: >> > Congratulations! >> > >> > Cheers, >> > L

disable dropping qualifiers from attributes

Hi, I found in some cases that qualifiers are dropped in the object attribute (or AttributeReference), which makes the test of semanticEquals between two expressions fail (one has qualifier and the other not). Is there any way that we can disable such dropping? Thanks. Ey-Chih Chow -- Sent f

Re: Welcoming Tejas Patil as a Spark committer

Congratulations Tejas. On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:31 PM, DB Tsai wrote: > Congratulations! > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Liwei Lin wrote: > > Congratulations! > > > > Cheers, > > Liwei > > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Yuval Itzchakov > wrote: > >> > >> Congratulations and Good luck!

Re: Welcoming Tejas Patil as a Spark committer

Congratulations! On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Liwei Lin wrote: > Congratulations! > > Cheers, > Liwei > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Yuval Itzchakov wrote: >> >> Congratulations and Good luck! :) >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ >> >

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

+1 Sincerely, DB Tsai -- Web: https://www.dbtsai.com PGP Key ID: 0x5CED8B896A6BDFA0 On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Felix Cheung wrote: > Thanks Nick, Hyukjin. Yes this seems to be a longer standing issue on RHEL > with respect to forking

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

Thanks Nick, Hyukjin. Yes this seems to be a longer standing issue on RHEL with respect to forking. From: Nick Pentreath Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 6:16:53 AM To: Hyukjin Kwon Cc: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4) Ah yes - I recall that it was fixed.

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

Ah yes - I recall that it was fixed. Forgot it was for 2.3.0 My +1 vote stands. On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 15:15 Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I believe that R test failure is due to SPARK-21093, at least the error > message looks the same, and that is fixed from 2.3.0. This was not > backporte

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

Hi Nick, I believe that R test failure is due to SPARK-21093, at least the error message looks the same, and that is fixed from 2.3.0. This was not backported because I and reviewers were worried as that fixed a very core to SparkR (even, it was reverted once even after very close look by some rev

Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4)

Checked sigs & hashes. Tested on RHEL build/mvn -Phadoop-2.7 -Phive -Pyarn test passed Python tests passed I ran R tests and am getting some failures: https://gist.github.com/MLnick/ddf4d531d5125208771beee0cc9c697e (I seem to recall similar issues on a previous release but I thought it was fixed)

Re: netlib-java not maintaned anymore?

yea, I think so. so, I think we just keep watching it for now. On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > It doesn't stop working though, so I don't think it means we have to stop > using it. It's a simple connector that doesn't depend on other stuff. > Unless there's another better opti

Re: netlib-java not maintaned anymore?

It doesn't stop working though, so I don't think it means we have to stop using it. It's a simple connector that doesn't depend on other stuff. Unless there's another better option, or until it no longer works, I think it's fine. On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:29 AM Takeshi Yamamuro wrote: > hi, devs

netlib-java not maintaned anymore?

hi, devs (somebody've already noticed that though...) This is just a heads-up. It seems the author of netlib-java stopped maintaining the product in a few ago: The github repository've gone: https://github.com/fommil/netlib-java/tree/master/netlib Currently, he put it under gitlab and `attic` mean