Hi Mark,
Thanks for getting back. I think you raise a very valid point about getting
into a plug-in base architecture instead of supporting the idiosyncrasies
of different schedulers. Yeah let me write a design doc so that it will at
least be another data point for how we think about the plug-in a
+1 looks good,
Regards,
Vaquar khan
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Matei Zaharia
wrote:
> +1; we should consider something similar for multi-dimensional tensors too.
>
> Matei
>
> > On Sep 23, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Yanbo Liang wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Noman Kha
+1; we should consider something similar for multi-dimensional tensors too.
Matei
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Yanbo Liang wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Noman Khan wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> Noman
> From: Denny Lee
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:59:33 AM
> To:
Just a friendly reminder, I've cut the next RC tag, that we're during the
release cycle so if you're merging issues into branch-2.1 please tag your
issues into 2.1.3 and I'll retag any issues in 2.1.3 into 2.1.2 when/if I
have to cut the next RC tag. I'll take care of this for issues merged into
br
+1
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Noman Khan wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> Noman
> --
> *From:* Denny Lee
> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 2:59:33 AM
> *To:* Apache Spark Dev; Sean Owen; Tim Hunter
> *Cc:* Danil Kirsanov; Joseph Bradley; Reynold Xin; Sudarshan Suda
+1
Regards
Noman
From: Denny Lee
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 2:59:33 AM
To: Apache Spark Dev; Sean Owen; Tim Hunter
Cc: Danil Kirsanov; Joseph Bradley; Reynold Xin; Sudarshan Sudarshan
Subject: Re: [VOTE][SPIP] SPARK-21866 Image support in Apache Spark
+1
O
