+1 as well. We should make a few maintenance releases.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:46 PM Felix Cheung
wrote:
> +1 on both 2.1.2 and 2.2.1
>
> And would try to help and/or wrangle the release if needed.
>
> (Note: trying to backport a few changes to branch-2.1 right now)
>
>
There's no problem that I'm aware of with a non-PMC member volunteering to
be release manager. I was RM for a couple Avro releases without being on
the PMC, and this is done regularly in the incubator where IPMC members
have binding votes, but someone in the incubating community is the RM.
We want
+1 on both 2.1.2 and 2.2.1
And would try to help and/or wrangle the release if needed.
(Note: trying to backport a few changes to branch-2.1 right now)
From: Sean Owen
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 12:05:28 AM
To: Holden Karau; dev
Subject: Re: 2.1.2 maintenan
Severity: Medium
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Versions of Apache Spark from 1.6.0 until 2.1.1
Description:
In Apache Spark 1.6.0 until 2.1.1, the launcher API performs unsafe
deserialization of data received by its socket. This makes applications
launched programmat
Let's look at the standard ASF guidance, which actually surprised me when I
first read it:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
VOTES ON PACKAGE RELEASES
Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority approval --
i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively fo
