Yes, SPARK-10335 is a bug that will be fixed when SPARK-5484 is fixed.
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 10:36 PM, Takeshi Yamamuro wrote:
>
> IMO SPARK-10335 should be tagged with "Bug"? If so, I think we should not
> close it and fix in future.
>
> // maropu
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Michael
I think this is usually done with `FileSystem.deleteOnExit`, which cleans
up when an executor exits. That's not quite what you want (job finish) but
is probably a reasonable fix.
rb
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Keith Chapman
wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Is it possible for an executor (or slave) to kno
