Re: Third party library

2016-11-25 Thread Reynold Xin
bcc dev@ and add user@ This is more a user@ list question rather than a dev@ list question. You can do something like this: object MySimpleApp { def loadResources(): Unit = // define some idempotent way to load resources, e.g. with a flag or lazy val def main() = { ... sc.paralleli

Third party library

2016-11-25 Thread vineet chadha
Hi, I am trying to invoke C library from the Spark Stack using JNI interface (here is sample application code) class SimpleApp { // ---Native methods @native def foo (Top: String): String } object SimpleApp { def main(args: Array[String]) { val conf = new SparkConf().setAppName("Simp

Re: SparkUI via proxy

2016-11-25 Thread marco rocchi
Thanks to all, I solved the problem. I'm sorry if the question was off topic, next time I'll post to stackoverflow. Thanks a lot 2016-11-25 17:19 GMT+01:00 marco rocchi : > Thanks for the helping. > I've created my ssh tunnel at port 4040, and setted browser firefox SOCKS > to localhost:4040. > N

Re: SparkUI via proxy

2016-11-25 Thread Ricardo Almeida
Marco, Depending on your configuration, maybe what you're looking for is: localhost:4040 Check this two StackOverflow answers: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31460079/spark-ui-on-aws-emr or similar questions. This is not a specific Spark issue. Please check StackOverflow or post to User Mail

Re: [SQL][JDBC] Possible regression in JDBC reader

2016-11-25 Thread Maciej Szymkiewicz
Thank you. On 11/25/2016 02:02 PM, Takeshi Yamamuro wrote: > Hi, > > Seems we forget to pass `parts:Array[Partition]` into `JDBCRelation`. > This was removed in this > commit: > https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b3130c7b6a1ab4975023f08c3ab02ee8d2c7e995#diff-f70bda59304588cc3abfa3a9840653f4L

Re: SparkUI via proxy

2016-11-25 Thread marco rocchi
Thanks for the helping. I've created my ssh tunnel at port 4040, and setted browser firefox SOCKS to localhost:4040. Now When I run a job I can read from INFO message: "SparkUI activated at http://192.168.1.204:4040";. But if I open the browser and type local host or http://192.168.1.204:4040, webU

Re: [SQL][JDBC] Possible regression in JDBC reader

2016-11-25 Thread Hyukjin Kwon
I believe https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975 fixes this regression. I am sorry for the trouble. 2016-11-25 22:23 GMT+09:00 Sean Owen : > See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15499#discussion_r89008564 in > particular. Hyukjin / Xiao do we need to undo part of this change? > > > On Fr

Re: [SQL][JDBC] Possible regression in JDBC reader

2016-11-25 Thread Sean Owen
See https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15499#discussion_r89008564 in particular. Hyukjin / Xiao do we need to undo part of this change? On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 1:02 PM Takeshi Yamamuro wrote: > Hi, > > Seems we forget to pass `parts:Array[Partition]` into `JDBCRelation`. > This was removed in

Re: [SQL][JDBC] Possible regression in JDBC reader

2016-11-25 Thread Takeshi Yamamuro
Hi, Seems we forget to pass `parts:Array[Partition]` into `JDBCRelation`. This was removed in this commit: https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b3130c7b6a1ab4975023f08c3ab02ee8d2c7e995#diff-f70bda59304588cc3abfa3a9840653f4L237 // maropu On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Maciej Szymkiewicz wrot

[SQL][JDBC] Possible regression in JDBC reader

2016-11-25 Thread Maciej Szymkiewicz
Hi, I've been reviewing my notes to https://git.io/v1UVC using Spark built from 51b1c1551d3a7147403b9e821fcc7c8f57b4824c and it looks like JDBC ignores both: * (columnName, lowerBound, upperBound, numPartitions) * predicates and loads everything into a single partition. Can anyone confirm th

RE: SparkUI via proxy

2016-11-25 Thread Ewan Leith
This is more of a question for the spark user’s list, but if you look at FoxyProxy and SSH tunnels it’ll get you going. These instructions from AWS for accessing EMR are a good start http://docs.aws.amazon.com/ElasticMapReduce/latest/DeveloperGuide/emr-ssh-tunnel.html http://docs.aws.amazon.com

Re: Scaling issues due to contention in Random

2016-11-25 Thread Sean Owen
SparkPi is just an example, so its performance doesn't really matter. Simpler is better. Kryo could be an issue but that would be a change in Kryo. On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 7:30 AM Prasun Ratn wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing perf degradation in the Spark/Pi example on a single-node > setup (using lo