+1 (non-binding)
Built and tested on CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 ／ openjdk version
"1.8.0_111".
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Ricardo Almeida <
ricardo.alme...@actnowib.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> tested over Ubuntu / OpenJDK 1.8.0_111
>
> On 4 November 2016 at 10:00, Sean Owen wrote
I will cut a new one once https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15774 gets
in.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I guess it's worth explicitly stating that I think we need another RC one
> way or the other because this test seems to consistently fail. It was a
> (surprising) la
+1
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>> 2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 22:00 PDT and passes if a
>> majority of at l
I guess it's worth explicitly stating that I think we need another RC one
way or the other because this test seems to consistently fail. It was a
(surprising) last-minute regression. I think I'd have to say -1 only for
this.
Reverting https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15706 for branch-2.0 would
+1
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Michael Armbrust
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>> 2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 22:00 PDT and passes if a
>> majority of at
+1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 22:00 PDT and passes if a
> majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache
SPARK-17510
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15132
It's for allowing tweaking of rate limiting on a per-partition basis
-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
I answered the duplicate post on the user mailing list, I'd say keep
the discussion there.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:14 PM, vonnagy wrote:
> Nitin,
>
> I am getting the similar issues using Spark 2.0.1 and Kafka 0.10. I have to
> jobs, one that uses a Kafka stream and one that uses just the Kafka
The DataWorks Summit EU 2017 (including Hadoop Summit) is going to be in
Munich April 5-6 2017
. I’ve pasted the text from the CFP below.
Would you like to share your knowledge with the best and brightest in the
data community? If so, we encourage you to submit an abstract for DataWorks
Summit wi
Nitin,
I am getting the similar issues using Spark 2.0.1 and Kafka 0.10. I have to
jobs, one that uses a Kafka stream and one that uses just the KafkaRDD.
With the KafkaRDD, I continually get the "Failed to get records". I have
adjusted the polling with `spark.streaming.kafka.consumer.poll.ms` a
+1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.0.2. The vote is open until Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 22:00 PDT and passes if a
> majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache
+1 (non-binding)
tested over Ubuntu / OpenJDK 1.8.0_111
On 4 November 2016 at 10:00, Sean Owen wrote:
> Likewise, ran my usual tests on Ubuntu with
> yarn/hive/hive-thriftserver/hadoop-2.6
> on JDK 8 and all passed. Sigs and licenses are OK. +1
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:57 PM Herman van H
Likewise, ran my usual tests on Ubuntu with
yarn/hive/hive-thriftserver/hadoop-2.6 on JDK 8 and all passed. Sigs and
licenses are OK. +1
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:57 PM Herman van Hövell tot Westerflier <
hvanhov...@databricks.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Michael Armbrust
13 matches
Mail list logo
