We already test CPython 2.6, CPython 3.4 and PyPy 2.5, it took more
than 30 min to run (without parallelization),
I think it should be enough.
PyPy 2.2 is too old that we have not enough resource to support that.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Chang Ya-Hsuan wrote:
> Hi I run ./python/ru-tests
Hi,
I've a simple Spark job that tries to broadcast an *Externalizable*
object across workers. A simple System.out confirm that the object is
only serialized with writeExternal and than deserialized without
readExternal. Personally I think this is a bug. I'm using the default
JavaSerializer w
Hello, I wanted to make known a new Apache Incubator proposal for
"Spark-Kernel", https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SparkKernelProposal, which
provides applications with a mechanism to interactively and remotely access
Spark. The proposal is just starting to be discussed on the general
incubator li
In the interim, you can just build it off branch-1.4 if you want.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> I actually tried to build a binary for 1.4.2 and wanted to start voting,
> but there was an issue with the release script that failed the jenkins job.
> Would be great to kick
I actually tried to build a binary for 1.4.2 and wanted to start voting,
but there was an issue with the release script that failed the jenkins job.
Would be great to kick off a 1.4.2 release.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I'm wondering if Spark 1.4.2 had be
Hi All,
I'm wondering if Spark 1.4.2 had been voted by any chance or if I have
overlooked and we are targeting 1.4.3?
By looking at the JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK/fixforversion/12332833/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-summary-panel
All issu
It was generally slow. But, after 5 or 10 minutes, it's all good.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:16 AM, shane knapp wrote:
> were you hitting any particular URL when you noticed this, or was it
> generally slow?
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Yin Huai wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Seems Jenkins
Why does stabilization of those two features require a 1.7 release instead
of 1.6.1?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Kostas Sakellis
wrote:
> We have veered off the topic of Spark 2.0 a little bit here - yes we can
> talk about RDD vs. DS/DF more but lets refocus on Spark 2.0. I'd like to
> pr
Yes. And those have been happening too.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Can I assume that for any particular test, if it passes reliably on
> SparkPullRequestBuilder,
> it should pass on maven Jenkins ?
>
> If so, should flaky test(s) be disabled, strengthened and enabled aga
Can I assume that for any particular test, if it passes reliably on
SparkPullRequestBuilder,
it should pass on maven Jenkins ?
If so, should flaky test(s) be disabled, strengthened and enabled again ?
Cheers
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> It only runs tests that are imp
We have veered off the topic of Spark 2.0 a little bit here - yes we can
talk about RDD vs. DS/DF more but lets refocus on Spark 2.0. I'd like to
propose we have one more 1.x release after Spark 1.6. This will allow us to
stabilize a few of the new features that were added in 1.6:
1) the experimen
It only runs tests that are impacted by the change. E.g. if you only modify
SQL, it won't run the core or streaming tests.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Hi,
> I noticed that SparkPullRequestBuilder completes much faster than maven
> Jenkins build.
>
> From
> https://amplab.c
Hi,
I noticed that SparkPullRequestBuilder completes much faster than maven
Jenkins build.
From
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45871/consoleFull
, I couldn't get exact time the builder started but looks like the duration
was around 20 minutes.
From
https://ampl
Hi,
I try to run the following 1.4.1 sample by putting a words.txt under
localdir
bin\run-example org.apache.spark.examples.streaming.HdfsWordCount localdir
2 questions
1. it does not pick up words.txt because it's 'old' I guess - any option to
let it picked up?
2. I managed to put a 'new' file
were you hitting any particular URL when you noticed this, or was it
generally slow?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Yin Huai wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Seems Jenkins is down or very slow? Does anyone else experience it or just
> me?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yin
--
phew. this is finally done... jenkins is up and building.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:16 AM, shane knapp wrote:
> this is still ongoing. the update is running 'chown -R jenkins' on
> the jenkins root directory, which is a hair under 3T.
>
> this might take a while... :\
>
> shane
>
> On Fri, No
this is still ongoing. the update is running 'chown -R jenkins' on
the jenkins root directory, which is a hair under 3T.
this might take a while... :\
shane
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:36 AM, shane knapp wrote:
> this is happening now.
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:14 PM, shane knapp wrote:
>
this is happening now.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:14 PM, shane knapp wrote:
> i will admit that it does seem like a bad idea to poke jenkins on
> friday the 13th, but there's a release that fixes a lot of security
> issues:
>
> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/SECURITY/Jenkins+Security+Advisor
18 matches
Mail list logo
