Should be binary-compatible across 2.10.x, so yes.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Really - I didn't know this ever was changed. But in any case, I think you
> can compile with 2.10.4 and run with 2.10.3 and it's fine - right?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ma
Really - I didn't know this ever was changed. But in any case, I think you
can compile with 2.10.4 and run with 2.10.3 and it's fine - right?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> We don't actually use Scala from the user's OS anymore, we use it from the
> Spark build, so it's
The second Spark Summit, an event to bring the Apache Spark community
together, will be in San Francisco on June 30, 2014. The call for
submissions is currently open, but will close on April 11. The summit is
looking for talks that will cover topics including applications built on
Spark, deployme
We don’t actually use Scala from the user’s OS anymore, we use it from the
Spark build, so it’s not a big deal. This release just has some bug fixes.
Matei
On Mar 28, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Kay Ousterhout wrote:
> What do we get by upgrading to 2.10.4? Just wondering if it's worth the
> annoyance
What do we get by upgrading to 2.10.4? Just wondering if it's worth the
annoyance of everyone needing to download a new version of Scala, making
yet another version of the AMIs, etc.
-Kay
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Sounds good. Feel free to send a PR even though it
RC3 works with the applications I'm working on now and MLLib performance is
indeed perceptibly improved over 0.9.0 (although I haven't done a real
evaluation). Also, from the downstream perspective, I've been tracking the
0.9.1 RCs in Fedora and have no issues to report there either:
http:/
Hi bearrito,
This is a known issue
(https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-1281) and it should
be easy to fix by switching to a hash partitioner.
CC'ed dev list in case someone volunteers to work on it.
Best,
Xiangrui
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:38 PM, bearrito wrote:
> Usage of negati
