Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Content Distribution Core 0.7.0

2025-03-11 Thread Timothee Maret
That makes sense, thank you ! I'll cancel the release and start a new one with your improvement. Regards, Timothée Le mar. 11 mars 2025 à 15:50, Christian Schneider a écrit : > I have provided a PR for a better interface: > https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/pu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Content Distribution Core 0.7.0

2025-03-11 Thread Jörg Hoh
+1 Am Mo., 10. März 2025 um 15:14 Uhr schrieb Timothee Maret : > Hi, > > We solved 1 issues in this release: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SLING/versions/12351425 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-2937/ > > You can use this UNI

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Content Distribution Core 0.7.0

2025-03-11 Thread Stefan Seifert
+1 stefan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Content Distribution Core 0.7.0

2025-03-11 Thread Christian Schneider
I have provided a PR for a better interface: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-distribution-core/pull/71 Regards, Christian On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 14:52, Timothee Maret wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Thanks for your vote ! > > The interface implementation builds File Vault serializer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Content Distribution Core 0.7.0

2025-03-11 Thread Timothee Maret
Hi Christian, Thanks for your vote ! The interface implementation builds File Vault serializers and thus needs to pass the parameters. The provider is needed to implement SLING-12704. Does that clear your concerns ? If not, could you please propose a constructive alternative ? Regards, Timoth

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Content Distribution Core 0.7.0

2025-03-11 Thread Christian Schneider
-1 The new DistributionContentSerializerProvider interface has far too many parameters in the build method. Also I do not understand why it is needed. We should first discuss and agree on a design before this API change is made. Christian On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 at 15:14, Timothee Maret wrote: >