On 9/6/10 10:40 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06.09.2010 16:25, Justin Edelson wrote:
>> I'm not sure why they wouldn't be cached in the first place. SilkSVN
>> is just a Windows distribution of the Subversion binaries, right? I've
>> seen weird things with SVNKit-based clients where a
Hi,
On 06.09.2010 16:25, Justin Edelson wrote:
> I'm not sure why they wouldn't be cached in the first place. SilkSVN
> is just a Windows distribution of the Subversion binaries, right? I've
> seen weird things with SVNKit-based clients where an alternate
> credentials cache is used, but that does