;> Aleksandar Bircakovic
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Aleksandar Bircakovic [mailto:a.bircako...@levi9.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 5:26 PM
>> To: dev@samza.apache.org
>> Cc: m.mis...@improvedigital.com
>> Subject: RE: Messages lost af
.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 5:26 PM
> To: dev@samza.apache.org
> Cc: m.mis...@improvedigital.com
> Subject: RE: Messages lost after broker failure
>
> Thank you Jagadish.
>
> Regarding leader selection, we exposed some additional metrics that are
> supposed to tell us wh
@samza.apache.org
Cc: m.mis...@improvedigital.com
Subject: RE: Messages lost after broker failure
Thank you Jagadish.
Regarding leader selection, we exposed some additional metrics that are
supposed to tell us which broker is leader for each partition and we confirmed
your theory, Samza consumer if
a.apache.org
Cc: m.mis...@improvedigital.com
Subject: Re: Messages lost after broker failure
>> All this is leading us to conclusion that Samza's consumers are
>> somehow
not aware of all of the partitions
We have had a number of broker failures at LinkedIn, and have not r
>> All this is leading us to conclusion that Samza's consumers are somehow
not aware of all of the partitions
We have had a number of broker failures at LinkedIn, and have not run into
data loss issues due to consumers being unaware of partitions. You can use
the metrics emitted at a per-partition
