Re: [Discuss] Moving Samza to Java 1.8 source compatibility.

2016-10-03 Thread Boris Shkolnik
+1 for moving to 1.8. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Jacob Maes wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I wanted to start a discussion to see what folks think about moving to Java > 1.8 source compatibility at some point after the 10.1 release. > > Java 8 has a number of nice features that can help us buil

Re: [Discuss] Moving Samza to Java 1.8 source compatibility.

2016-09-30 Thread Yi Pan
Hi, guys, I have not seen any objection since May on this one. I am concluding it as everyone is cool w/ moving to JDK8 in 0.12. @Jake, can you send out a [RESULT][DISCUSS] email to close this one? Thanks! -Yi On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Monal wrote: > Here at Netflix, we have been runni

Re: [Discuss] Moving Samza to Java 1.8 source compatibility.

2016-05-09 Thread Monal
Here at Netflix, we have been running Samza on 1.8 since last year and have been in production with it. So move to 1.8 is a welcome. No concerns there for us. Thanks Monal On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Jacob Maes wrote: > Thanks everyone. Sounds like a few want to move forward with Java 1.8 >

Re: [Discuss] Moving Samza to Java 1.8 source compatibility.

2016-05-02 Thread Jacob Maes
Thanks everyone. Sounds like a few want to move forward with Java 1.8 source compatibility. I still think it would be useful to hear from a Java 1.7 shop. Hey Maurice, as I recall you were running Samza on Java 1.7. Is that still the case? Do you have a roadmap to move to 1.8? Do you typically kee

Re: [Discuss] Moving Samza to Java 1.8 source compatibility.

2016-04-28 Thread Navina Ramesh
+1 for moving to JDK8. We have traditionally been pretty slow at releasing. I think we need to start thinking in terms of long-term release plans and iterate faster. Prior to Samza 1.0, I think we will at least have 2 releases: 0.10.1 -> featuring mostly bug-fixes and improvements to host-affinit

Re: [Discuss] Moving Samza to Java 1.8 source compatibility.

2016-04-28 Thread Roger Hoover
+1 for me. We're already using Java 8 in PRD. On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Yi Pan wrote: > I am +1 on the JDK8 move. As Jake has elaborated, there are numerous > advantages from 1.8 source compatible code. > > As for the downside of dropping JDK7 support, obviously, bin > backward-compatib

Re: [Discuss] Moving Samza to Java 1.8 source compatibility.

2016-04-28 Thread Yi Pan
I am +1 on the JDK8 move. As Jake has elaborated, there are numerous advantages from 1.8 source compatible code. As for the downside of dropping JDK7 support, obviously, bin backward-compatibility will be broken. However, moving to JDK8 binary is not a big effort for JDK7-compatible Java and Scala