It has been 72+ hours since the VOTE thread started, and we have received 3
binding + 1 non-binding votes on the proposal.
The vote has passed, and this proposal is accepted.
Thanks,
Prateek
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 2:14 PM Bharath Kumara Subramanian <
codin.mart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (bindin
+1 (binding). Looking forward to seeing this running in production.
--
Bharath
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:41 PM Sanil Jain wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) Thanks for the contribution
>
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 13:09, Prateek Maheshwari
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding). Thanks for the contribution!
> >
> >
+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the contribution
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 13:09, Prateek Maheshwari
wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the contribution!
>
> - Prateek
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:13 AM Yi Pan wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) this is going to improve our state recovery story
> > significant
+1 (binding). Thanks for the contribution!
- Prateek
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:13 AM Yi Pan wrote:
> +1 (binding) this is going to improve our state recovery story
> significantly!
>
> -Yi
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 1:03 PM Daniel Chen wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote o
+1 (binding) this is going to improve our state recovery story
significantly!
-Yi
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 1:03 PM Daniel Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a vote on SEP-28: Samza State Backend Interface and
> Checkpointing Improvements. Thanks to everyone who was involved with the
>
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on SEP-28: Samza State Backend Interface and
Checkpointing Improvements. Thanks to everyone who was involved with the
design and reviews to refine the proposal.
Discussion thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/samza-dev/202106.mbox/%3cCA+6YmWVVxz=xr244
