Re: [VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-04-09 Thread santhosh venkat
Hi, The vote of SEP-11 had been open for more than 72 hours and we got +1 (binding) x 3. Votes are as follows: +1 (binding) - Yi Pan, Xinyu Liu, Jagadish Venkatraman. SEP-11 had officially passed the VOTE! Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-04-09 Thread santhosh venkat
Hi Jagadish, Thanks for your feedback. I have added the suggestion test-case to the test plan. Thanks. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Jagadish Venkatraman < jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Shanthoosh, > > As discussed earlier, I think we should add an explicit test-case for > verifying that

Re: [VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-04-09 Thread Jagadish Venkatraman
Shanthoosh, As discussed earlier, I think we should add an explicit test-case for verifying that we minimize partition movements during rolling upgrades. Please update the proposal with this missing test-case. Other than this, +1 (binding) from my side. Thanks! On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Ja

Re: [VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-04-06 Thread Jagadish Venkatraman
Let's extend the vote to Monday 11:59PM PST. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:05 PM, xinyu liu wrote: > +1 (binding). Look forward to the implementation. > > Xinyu > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Yi Pan wrote: > > > +1 (binding). Thanks for the revisions! > > > > -Yi > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-04-05 Thread xinyu liu
+1 (binding). Look forward to the implementation. Xinyu On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Yi Pan wrote: > +1 (binding). Thanks for the revisions! > > -Yi > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:39 PM, santhosh venkat < > santhoshvenkat1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is a voting thread for SEP-

Re: [VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-04-04 Thread Yi Pan
+1 (binding). Thanks for the revisions! -Yi On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:39 PM, santhosh venkat < santhoshvenkat1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a voting thread for SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone. > > For reference, here is the wiki link: https://cwiki.apache.org > /confluence/pages/vie

[VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-04-04 Thread santhosh venkat
Hi, This is a voting thread for SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone. For reference, here is the wiki link: https://cwiki.apache.org /confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75957309 Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-03-15 Thread santhosh venkat
Yi, Thanks for your feedback. Replies inline. >> in YARN, are you sure that we persist the JobModel to coordinator stream? I checked the code and didn't find that. The JobModel was simply generated and served from the memory in the JobCoordinator. Yes, that’s right. Updated the SEP based upon

[CANCEL][VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-03-15 Thread santhosh venkat
Hi, This is an official CANCEL for the SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone vote. Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-02-22 Thread Yi Pan
Hi, Santhoosh, Overall looks good to me now. There are still some minor issues / errors in the design doc - in YARN, are you sure that we persist the JobModel to coordinator stream? I checked the code and didn't find that. The JobModel was simply generated and served from the memory in the JobCoor

[VOTE] SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone.

2018-02-20 Thread santhosh venkat
Hi everyone, This is a voting thread for SEP-11: Host affinity in standalone. For reference, here is the wiki link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75957309 Link to discussion mail thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/samza-dev/201802.mbox/%3CCAFvExu2