Hey Yan,
Awesome! Just realized--could you also open a ticket to migrate
hello-samza/master to 0.9.0, and hello-samza/latest to 0.10.0?
Cheers,
Chris
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Yan Fang wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Have updated website for 0.9 release. Feel free to check it. Only one thing
> rem
Hi guys,
Have updated website for 0.9 release. Feel free to check it. Only one thing
remaining - waiting for the blog account.
Thanks,
Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Roger Hoover
wrote:
> Nice. Thanks Yan!
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Yan Fang wrote:
Nice. Thanks Yan!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Yan Fang wrote:
> Cool.
>
> * Published to maven, it's already there.
> * Uploaded to dist/release. It may take a while for mirrors to pick it up.
> * Updated the downloading page in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-624
> ** Will p
Hey Yan,
Based on this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Blogs
It looks like you'll need to open an INFRA ticket to get your blog account.
=)
Cheers,
Chris
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Yan Fang wrote:
> Cool.
>
> * Published to m
Cool.
* Published to maven, it's already there.
* Uploaded to dist/release. It may take a while for mirrors to pick it up.
* Updated the downloading page in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-624
** Will publish the website after mirrors pick up the 0.9.0 release
** In terms of the blog,
Hey Yan/Jakob,
Awesome, thanks! Yan, feel free to finish up the release. :) Very cool!
Cheers,
Chris
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Correct. All that's necessary for a release is a
> more-+1s-than--1s-from-PMC-members vote, and then we can go ahead with
> distribution,
Correct. All that's necessary for a release is a
more-+1s-than--1s-from-PMC-members vote, and then we can go ahead with
distribution, publicity, etc.
-jg
On 31 March 2015 at 12:44, Chris Riccomini wrote:
> Hey Yan,
>
> Let's confirm with Jakob. I *think* we don't need any intervention from
> Apa
Hey Yan,
Let's confirm with Jakob. I *think* we don't need any intervention from
Apache. We should be able to move forward with the release. @Jakob, can you
confirm this?
Cheers,
Chris
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Yan Fang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After 72+ hours, we got +4 binding votes (Chr
Hi all,
After 72+ hours, we got +4 binding votes (Chris, Jakob, Chinmay, Yan) , +2
non-binding votes (Roger, Yi Pan). The release vote passes.
@Chris, Do we need the vote from apache general mailing list? Or I can go
ahead to update to release dist, update download page, publish 0.8.0
binaries to
Of say yes, is been a few days with little traffic on the topic.
On Mar 31, 2015 9:18 AM, "Chris Riccomini" wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Is the vote done?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Chris Riccomini
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 1. Validated hello-samza works with 0.9.0 Maven b
Hey all,
Is the vote done?
Cheers,
Chris
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Chris Riccomini
wrote:
> +1
>
> 1. Validated hello-samza works with 0.9.0 Maven binaries.
> 2. Validated release-0.9.0-rc0 tag exists and has correct checksums.
> 3. Validated source release tarball builds, and has corre
+1
1. Validated hello-samza works with 0.9.0 Maven binaries.
2. Validated release-0.9.0-rc0 tag exists and has correct checksums.
3. Validated source release tarball builds, and has correct licenses
(bin/check-all.sh).
4. Validated source release tarball validates against Yan's PGP key.
5. Ran rol
+1
* Created and tested an sample job doing a join
* Build packages
* Couldn't get integration tests to work. It seemed like it was timing out
trying to download dependencies. I may have been having network issues
last night.
Cheers,
Roger
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
+1 (binding)
* Verified sig and checksum
* Spot checked files, verified license and notice
* Built packages
* Ran hello samza
Good work, Yan.
-jg
On 29 March 2015 at 13:08, Chinmay Soman wrote:
> +1
>
> * Verified signature against the release
> * Verified authenticity of the key
> * Ran hello
+1
* Verified signature against the release
* Verified authenticity of the key
* Ran hello-samza (latest branch) - all 3 jobs succeed againt 0.9.0 release
* Ran integration tests - all 3 tests pass (after addresing SAMZA-621.
Also, once a failure occurs - I have to manually kill the Yarn daemons.
Hi Chris and Jakob,
Sure. Let's do the voting until Monday. Hope more guys have time to try and
validate the 0.9.0 version.
Thanks,
Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com
+1 (206) 849-4108
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Chris Riccomini
wrote:
> Hey Yan,
>
> Yea, could we delay until Monday? I have
Hey Yan,
Yea, could we delay until Monday? I have been doing a lot of burn-in, and
have found some issues with the torture tests in SAMZA-394. The issues
appear to be with the tests themselves, not data-loss/correctness issues in
Samza, but I just want to make sure. Planning to run the burn-in ove
That would be great. I've been trying to get to this but have failed.
I can definitely look at the release tomorrow.
-jg
On 27 March 2015 at 16:08, Yan Fang wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> It has been 72 hours. We got +1 from Yi Pan. Do we extend the voting to
> this weekend ?
>
> Thanks,
> Fang, Yan
> y
Hi guys,
It has been 72 hours. We got +1 from Yi Pan. Do we extend the voting to
this weekend ?
Thanks,
Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com
+1 (206) 849-4108
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Yi Pan wrote:
> I have ran the integration test suite w/ 0.9.0-rc0. There were some issues
> related w/ the
I have ran the integration test suite w/ 0.9.0-rc0. There were some issues
related w/ the integration test: SAMZA-621, but the test suite passed after
I manually created a symlink to the file name the test script is looking
for.
Hence, +1 on the release.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Roger Hoo
Hi Chris + all,
I created a basic job that does a join from local state with Samza 0.9.0 (
https://github.com/Quantiply/rico-playground/tree/master/join/samza). So
far so good. I hoping to get some time this weekend to benchmark it on my
laptop. I think I saw that 0.9.0 includes support for send
Hey all,
I'm running validations and some burn-in. I'll post my vote tomorrow.
It's been pretty quiet. It'd be good to get other committers/non-committers
to do validation as well.
Cheers,
Chris
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Yan Fang wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Opps, signed it with another ke
Hi Chris,
Opps, signed it with another key. Now updated all files in
http://people.apache.org/~yanfang/samza-0.9.0-rc0/ . Verified. Sorry for
the inconvenience.
Cheers,
Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com
+1 (206) 849-4108
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Chris Riccomini
wrote:
> Hey Yan,
>
> Wer
Hey Yan,
Were you able to validate the source tarball? I ran:
$ gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key CAC06239EA00BA80
gpg: requesting key EA00BA80 from hkp server pgpkeys.mit.edu
gpg: key EA00BA80: public key "Yan Fang (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
yanf...@apache.org>" imported
gpg: Total number pro
Hey all,
This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.9.0. This is our
first release as the Apache top-level project. Thanks to everyone who has
contributed to this release. We are very glad to see some new contributors
in this release.
The release candidate can be downloaded from her
25 matches
Mail list logo
