Re: [VOTE] SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza

eb 7, 2023 at 2:14 PM Bharath Kumara Subramanian < > codin.mart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Cheers, > > Bharath > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:56 PM Lakshmi Manasa < > lakshmimanas...@gmail.com> > > wrote: >

[VOTE] SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza

Hi folks, This is a call for vote on SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza. Thank you for reviewing the SEP and giving feedback. I have addressed the comments on the SEP and since there were three +1 on the discuss thread, starting this vote. Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/vjtl5fnf64

Re: [DISCUSS] SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza

1 (approve) from my end. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 11:41 PM Yi Pan wrote: >> >> > Hi, Manasa, >> > >> > Sorry for the late reply. The revision lgtm. Thanks for the great work! >> > >> > Best, >> > >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza

Hi Yi, I have updated the SEP-32 including all feedback for the above questions. Please let me know if there are any follow up questions. thanks, Manasa On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:56 AM Lakshmi Manasa wrote: > Hi Yi, > > thank you for raising these questions. Please find my answe

Re: [DISCUSS] SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza

> d) how do we compare this w/ an alternative idea that implements a > KeyedOrderedExecutor w/ multiple parallel threads within the single task's > main event loop to increase the parallelism? > > Best, > > -Yi > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:26 PM Lakshmi Manasa >

Re: [DISCUSS] SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza

hi all, if there are no concerns or questions about this SEP, I shall start the vote email thread tomorrow. thanks, Manasa On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 8:08 AM Lakshmi Manasa wrote: > Hi all, > We created SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza. > > Please find SEP here ( > https://c

[DISCUSS] SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza

Hi all, We created SEP-32: Elasticity for Samza. Please find SEP here ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SAMZA/SEP-32%3A+Elasticity+for+Samza ) Please take a look and provide feedback. thanks, Manasa

Re: Manipulating Starting Offsets for Input Streams

Hi Paul, Similar to CheckpointTool (see Manipulating checkpoints manually) a StartpointTool can be written. The org.apache.samza.checkpoint.CheckpointTool takes in the config.properties and offset.properties as in

[RESULT] [VOTE] SEP-26: Add SystemProducer for Azure Blob Storage

The vote on SEP-26 has been open for > 72 hours and has 3 binding +1s. SEP-26 is accepted. Thanks, Manasa

Re: [VOTE] SEP-26: Add SystemProducer for Azure Blob Storage

t; wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding), looking forward to Samza's integration with Azure blobs > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 8, 2020, Lakshmi Manasa < > lakshmimanas...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi

[VOTE] SEP-26: Add SystemProducer for Azure Blob Storage

Hi, This is a call for a vote on SEP-26: Add SystemProducer for Azure Blob Storage. Thanks for taking a look and giving feedback. I have addressed the comments on the SEP and since there were no major questions/objections, starting this vote. Discussion thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mo

Re: [DISCUSS] SEP-26: Add SystemProducer for Azure Blob Storage

questions or objections by EOD let's move to the VOTE. > > > > Thanks, > > Prateek > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:27 PM Lakshmi Manasa < > lakshmimanas...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We

[DISCUSS] SEP-26: Add SystemProducer for Azure Blob Storage

Hi all, We created SEP-26: Add SystemProducer for Azure Blob Storage. Please find SEP here ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SAMZA/SEP-26%3A+Azure+Blob+Storage+Producer ) Please take a look and provide feedback. thanks, Manasa