Hi Yi,
I got it now, thanks for your help!
Qi Shu
> 在 2017年5月18日，05:22，Yi Pan 写道：
>
> Hi, Qi,
>
> This would depend on the following two factors:
> # whether the send() is async or sync
> # how do you handle the send failure
>
> If the send() is sync, you will always receive
GitHub user prateekm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/samza/pull/194
SAMZA-1221, SAMZA-1101: Internal cleanup for High-Level API implementation.
SAMZA-1221: Separated the OperatorSpec and MessageStream DAGs so that
they're now duals of each other. Users interact with
Hi, Qi,
This would depend on the following two factors:
# whether the send() is async or sync
# how do you handle the send failure
If the send() is sync, you will always receive an exception in your
process() method when MessageCollector.send() is invoked. Hence, if your
code does not handle the
Resent the CANCEL email, hopefully it makes it this time.
- Prateek
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Navina Ramesh (Apache)
wrote:
> Prateek told me that he sent out a cancel email. It didn't reach the
> mail-archive I think. Lately, we have this kind of issues where the emails
> are not reachi
Prateek told me that he sent out a cancel email. It didn't reach the
mail-archive I think. Lately, we have this kind of issues where the emails
are not reaching our dev list.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Yi Pan wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Based on the conversation above, can we officially cancel t
Prateek told me that he sent out a cancel email. It didn't reach the
mail-archive I think. Lately, we have this kind of issues where the emails
are not reaching our dev list.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Yi Pan wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Based on the conversation above, can we officially cancel t
Hi, all,
Based on the conversation above, can we officially cancel this vote?
Thanks!
-Yi
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Ignacio Solis wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Navina Ramesh
> wrote:
> > I will try to get the patch out today. Work doesn't look trivial. I am on
