I don't think that is the right behavior.
Dave
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:22 AM Michael Bien wrote:
> I noticed when upgrading from 6.1 to 6.1.1, Roller ran the upgrade
> scripts again, is that intended?
>
> Its probably fine to run them twice even though nothing db related
> changed in the patc
I noticed when upgrading from 6.1 to 6.1.1, Roller ran the upgrade
scripts again, is that intended?
Its probably fine to run them twice even though nothing db related
changed in the patch release - i was still wondering.
-michael
On 24.12.21 23:49, Dave wrote:
I put together a release that
i keep getting surprised how bad the compatibility of SQL is. Even
simple statements need special casing. At lest newer MySQL can use the
standard alter/rename syntax.
thanks for fixing this Dave,
michael
On 24.12.21 23:49, Dave wrote:
I put together a release that fixes the upgrade problem
I put together a release that fixes the upgrade problem with old MySQLs:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/roller/roller-6.1/v6.1.1
I'm not going to call a release vote yet, because I think there might be
other fixes we want to get in.
Thanks,
Dave
