Re: VOTE: Release Roller v6.1.0

On 15.12.21 11:53, Greg Huber wrote: may be worth checking: From the docs: The quotes are wrong ie ` possibly make users check the script??: grant all on rollerdb.* to scott@`%' identified by `tiger'; grant all on rollerdb.* to scott@localhost identified by `tiger'; i haven't touche

Re: VOTE: Release Roller v6.1.0

On 15.12.21 11:53, Greg Huber wrote: When doing a search, and logged, we get a login url on the bottom of search page. http://localhost:8080/roller/mainpage/search?q=test  * Front Page  * Weblog  * Login

Re: VOTE: Release Roller v6.1.0

log4j2 2.17 is (almost) released. https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-dev/202112.mbox/%3C66E7128B-B0FC-47AF-ABB3-BB360B40FAB6%40dslextreme.com%3E should we bump the dependencies again, add the CommentServlet PR and spin another rc? -michael On 14.12.21 23:09, Dave wrote: I pr

Re: VOTE: Release Roller v6.1.0

Had to do a complete reinstall. Good work. +1 b Cheers Greg may be worth checking: From the docs: The quotes are wrong ie ` possibly make users check the script??: grant all on rollerdb.* to scott@`%' identified by `tiger'; grant all on rollerdb.* to scott@localhost identified by `ti

Re: VOTE: Release Roller v6.1.0

+1 > On Dec 15, 2021, at 9:37, Michael Bien wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > ran some manual tests: > > - verified sha256 for the binaries > - verified that log4j2 2.16 is used, and nothing else > - tested fresh deployment on tomcat 9 + postgres 14.1 + JDK 11 + > debian-slim-bullseye in a podman

Re: VOTE: Release Roller v6.1.0

+1 (binding) ran some manual tests: - verified sha256 for the binaries - verified that log4j2 2.16 is used, and nothing else - tested fresh deployment on tomcat 9 + postgres 14.1 + JDK 11 + debian-slim-bullseye in a podman container - repeated same test on JDK 17 - didn't test the migration lo