Re: Apache Roller 6.0.1 release now available

2020-05-28 Thread Aditya Sharma
Thank you Justin! I will do the needful. Also, I will check if there are any more entries in NOTICE files that correspond to such dependencies. Thanks and regards, Aditya Sharma On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 05:28, Dave wrote: > Thanks for your attention to detail Justin. Truly appreciated. We should

Re: Apache Roller 6.0.1 release now available

2020-05-28 Thread Dave
Thanks for your attention to detail Justin. Truly appreciated. We should remove that notice. Dave On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:37 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Only stuff that is in the distributions needs to be mentioned [1] (see > guiding principle). If it not in the release artefact and j

Re: Apache Roller 6.0.1 release now available

2020-05-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Only stuff that is in the distributions needs to be mentioned [1] (see guiding principle). If it not in the release artefact and just a dependancy then it shouldn't be mentioned. Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html

Re: Apache Roller 6.0.1 release now available

2020-05-28 Thread Dave
Also, the Roller source release does not include CDDL code. It is brought in at build time via a Maven dependency. If that is the case, do we need that notice? Dave On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 5:00 AM Aditya Sharma wrote: > Thanks for the heads up Justin! > > As far as I know, Apache Roller uses J

Re: Apache Roller 6.0.1 release now available

2020-05-28 Thread Aditya Sharma
Thanks for the heads up Justin! As far as I know, Apache Roller uses Java Mail API[1] as a dependency[2] which is CDDL licensed. As per the commit[3] in Notice file, it has been added long back in 2015. 1. https://javaee.github.io/javamail/ 2. https://github.com/apache/roller/blob/master/app/pom.

Re: Apache Roller 6.0.1 release now available

2020-05-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I was taking a look at your release and noticed the NOTICE file mentions it contains some CDDL licensed code. CDDL is Category B [1] and as such can't be included in a source release. Just wondering the history of this statement and if this licensed code is included in the source release.