+1
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 3:49 PM jinrongtong wrote:
> +1, I checked[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current
> artifacts.[OK] The code can be built success in the source
> package.[OK] Start nameserver and broker according to the
> quick-start[OK] Run clusterList command to see
+1
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 5:39 PM ShannonDing wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2024-07-22 10:10:04, "jinrongtong" wrote:
>
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for the 2.3.1 release of Apache RocketMQ-Spring.
>
>
>
> The artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/ro
+1
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:44 PM fuyou wrote:
> +1
>
> Gaoyang Cai 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道：
>
> > +1(Non-binding)
> > I've checked:
> >
> > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > [OK] Source code
+1
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:59 PM lollipop wrote:
> +1
> Glad to see the proposal for Apache RocketMQ ACL 2.0.
> I believe this new version will significantly enhance the security features
> of RocketMQ and provide users with more granular and flexible access
> control.
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 a
