Re: [Discussion] PR #24423 Handling Overloaded Netty Channels in Apache Pulsar

2025-07-11 Thread Lari Hotari
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 at 12:33, Yubiao Feng wrote: > Increasing the parameter of Netty leads to more bytes that will be sent > out, which are maintained by the Netty write-out buffer, but the broker > still will face an OOM issue because the response is being generated. The > purpose of the fix is n

Re: [Discussion] PR #24423 Handling Overloaded Netty Channels in Apache Pulsar

2025-07-11 Thread Lin Lin
Hi Yubiao: If a sufficient number of PulsarClients are started at one time, the number of channels will also increase. Concurrent requests can still cause Broker OOM. For example, with each channel limited to 100MB, 1 million channels. This is what I meant by the lack of a global perspective. T

[VOTE] DotPulsar Release 4.3.1-rc.1

2025-07-11 Thread David Jensen
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate for the version 4.3.1, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) DotPulsar's KEYS file contains the PGP keys we used to sign this release: https://downloads.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] PIP-432: Add isEncrypted field to EncryptionContext

2025-07-11 Thread xiangying meng
+1 binding Thanks, Xiangying On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 1:19 PM Tao Jiuming wrote: > > +1 nonbinding > > PengHui Li 于2025年7月10日 周四22:48写道: > > > Hi Team, > > > > This is the official VOTE thread for PIP-432. > > - Discuss thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/sfcc902hwlgwg21ttwkrsyx3ogt8hzon

Re: [VOTE] PIP-432: Add isEncrypted field to EncryptionContext

2025-07-11 Thread Tao Jiuming
+1 nonbinding PengHui Li 于2025年7月10日 周四22:48写道: > Hi Team, > > This is the official VOTE thread for PIP-432. > - Discuss thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/sfcc902hwlgwg21ttwkrsyx3ogt8hzon > - Proposal link: > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/b212cb3ea93c98f179e19e6aef13e52bec55d4d5