Thanks for the proposal.
The motivation looks good to me, users can connect to their preferred or
customized schema registry with this proposal, which can get rid of the
limitation from the Pulsar built-in schema registry.
I have a few questions about the migration or compatibility.
- For a topi
+1, +1
The load balancing has a good migration guide (
https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/4.0.x/concepts-broker-load-balancing-migration/
)
There are two scenarios we need to consider and handle:
1. How to migrate topics that are already using Pulsar's built-in schema
to an external one. This scena
+1
- Penghui
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 9:05 AM Tao Jiuming wrote:
> great job, LGTM
>
>
> Lari Hotari 于2025年5月30日 周五23:14写道：
>
> > sounds good to me. As you mentioned, Java 8 users can stay on 4.0.x, so
> > that support isn't going away anytime soon. (4.0.x security support is in
> > our plans un
