Re: [DISCUSS] PIP-408: add maxRetryRequestTimes in ClientConfigurationData and remove duplicate retry logic

LGTM, i leave some comments in pr. On 2025/02/18 02:05:48 吕泓瑾 wrote: > Dear Apache Pulsar Community, > I would like to propose introducing a configuration property in > ClientConfigurationData through PIP-408，which aims to eliminate redundant > request retry logic between AsyncHttpClient and Async

Re: [DISCUSS] Doubt about the widely used Netty Recycler in Pulsar

Totally agree with this. No more unnecessary complexity into the code base. Wenzhi Feng. On 2025/02/22 09:01:55 Yunze Xu wrote: > Bump this thread again. > > I really suffered from the use of Netty recyclers. It makes code much > really harder to maintain. I also made a benchmark and the recycler

[VOTE] PIP-398: Subscription replication on the broker, namespace and topic levels

Hi all, I would like to vote for https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23770 Thanks, Zixuan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pulsar 0.5.0

Hi Enrico, I've verified that the internal package structures of versions 0.5.0 and 0.4.0 remain identical. Based on the [Release Validation Process documentation](https://github.com/apache/pulsar-manager/wiki/Release-Candidate-Validation), I've optimized the deployment procedure with reliability